»ó´ãÀǹæ

  ±è¸íÇõ ¸ñ»ç
  Re: ÄÉÁ÷¼ºÈ­¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©
  

»ç¶ûÇÏ´Â À强±Ù Çлý¿¡°Ô



´äÀÌ ´Ê¾îÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. ³Ê¹« ¹Ù»Ú°Ô Áö³»´Ù ÀÌ·¸°Ô ´äÀÌ ´Ê¾îÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. ÄÉÁ÷»ç°æȸ(Keswick Convention)´Â 1800³â´ë Èı⠿µ±¹ ¼­ºÏºÎ Cumbria È£¼ö Áö¿ªÀÇ ¾Æ¸§´Ù¿î ¸¶À»ÀÎ KeswickÀÇ St. John's Church¿¡¼­ ÀϾ ȸ°³¿Í Çå½Å°ú ¼ºÈ­¸¦ °­Á¶ÇÏ´Â ±âµµ ¹× ºÎÈï¿îµ¿À» ¸»Çϴµ¥ ±×ÈĺÎÅÍ Áö±Ý±îÁö ¸Å³â 7¿ù ±×°÷¿¡¼­ µÎ ÁÖ°£µ¿¾È ¼öõ¸íÀÌ ¸ðÀÌ´Â °¡¿îµ¥ Å« õ¸·¾È¿¡¼­ 'ÄÉÁ÷ »ç°æȸ'¸¦ °³ÃÖÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ³ª´Â ±×°÷¿¡ µÎ ¹ø °¡ º¸¾Ò´Âµ¥ ¼ø¼öÇÑ ½Ã°æȸ·Î ÀºÇý°¡ ³ÑĨ´Ï´Ù. 'All one in Christ Jesus'¶ó´Â ÁÖÁ¦¸¦ °¡Áö°í ¸ðÀ̴µ¥ ÁÖ·Î ¿µ±¹ÀÇ ¿µÀûÀÎ ÁöµµÀÚµéÀÌ °­»ç·Î ºÀÇÏÇßÁö¸¸ ºô¸® ±×·¡ÇÔ ¹Ú»ç°°Àº ¿Ü±¹ °­»çµµ °­»ç·Î (1975³â) ºÀ»çÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ³ª´Â Çѱ¹¿¡ ÄÉÁ÷»ç°æȸ¸¦ µµÀÔÇÏ¿© ¿©·¯¹ø '¼­¿ï ÄÉÁ÷ »ç°æȸ'¸¦ °³ÃÖÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ±× ³»¿ëÀ» ´ÙÀ½¿¡ Àû¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ±×¸®°í ¿µ¾î·Î µÈ ÀڷḦ ¿©±â ½Ç¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. Âü°íÇϱ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù. Çϳª´ÔÀÇ ÀºÇý¿Í »ç¶ûÀÌ ÇÔ²² ÇϽñ⸦ ±â¿øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. »ç¶ûÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

2005³â 5¿ù 29ÀÏ ±è¸íÇõ ¸ñ»ç





1985. 2. 4 - 7 Á¦1ȸ ¼­¿ï ÄÉÁ÷»ç°æȸ °³ÃÖ

Àå ¼Ò : ÇÒ·¼·ç¾ß±³È¸

ÁÖ Á¦ : ¼º°æÀû »ýÈ°

Ç¥ ¾î : ±×¸®½ºµµ ¾È¿¡¼­ ¸ðµÎ Çϳª

°­ »ç : George Duncan, ÇÑ°æÁ÷, ¹ÚÀ±¼±, ÀÌ»ó±Ù ¸ñ»ç

ÃâÆÇ : Á¦¸ñ : "¼º°æÀû »ýÈ°"(Á¦1ȸ ¼­¿ï ÄÉÁ÷ÀÇ ¸Þ½ÃÁö)

µÎ¶õ³ë¼­¿ø °­Çؼ³±³ ½Ã¸®Áî 8

¿«ÀºÀÌ : Çѱ¹º¹À½ÁÖÀÇÇùÀÇȸ

ÃâÆÇ»ç : µÎ¶õµµ¼­¿ø Æì³½³¯ 1986. 1. 15



1986. 2. 10 - 14 Á¦2ȸ ¼­¿ï ÄÉÁ÷»ç°æȸ °³ÃÖ

Àå ¼Ò : »ç¶ûÀDZ³È¸

°­ »ç : Paul Rees, Philip Hacking, ¹ÚÀ±¼±,±èâÀÎ,ÀÌ»ó±Ù ¸ñ»ç

ÁÖ Á¦ : ¼º°æÀû ¼º°á »ýÈ°

Ç¥ ¾î : ±×¸®½ºµµ¾È¿¡¼­ ¸ðµÎ Çϳª

ÃâÆÇ : Á¦¸ñ : "¼º°æÀû ¼º°á"(Á¦2ȸ ¼­¿ï ÄÉÁ÷ÀÇ ¸Þ½ÃÁö)

µÎ¶õ³ë¼­¿ø °­Çؼ³±³ ½Ã¸®Áî 11

¿«ÀºÀÌ : Çѱ¹º¹À½ÁÖÀÇÇùÀÇȸ

ÃâÆÇ»ç : µÎ¶õµµ¼­¿ø Æì³½³¯ 1987. 1. 15



1987. 2. 9. - 12 Á¦3ȸ ¼­¿ï ÄÉÁ÷»ç°æȸ °³ÃÖ

Àå ¼Ò : »ç¶ûÀDZ³È¸

°­ »ç : ÁÒÁö ´øÄ­ ¸ñ»ç,¸ð¸®¾ß¸¶ ¸ñ»ç,ÇÑ°æÁ÷ ¸ñ»ç,¹ÚÀ±¼± ¸ñ»ç

ÁÖ Á¦ : ¼º°æÀû ±âµµ»ýÈ°

Ç¥ ¾î : ±×¸®½ºµµ¾È¿¡¼­ ¸ðµÎ Çϳª

ÃâÆÇ : Á¦¸ñ : "¼º°æÀû ±âµµ»ýÈ°"(Á¦3ȸ ¼­¿ï ÄÉÁ÷ÀÇ ¸Þ½ÃÁö)

µÎ¶õ³ë¼­¿ø °­Çؼ³±³ ½Ã¸®Áî 13

¿«ÀºÀÌ : Çѱ¹º¹À½ÁÖÀÇÇùÀÇȸ

ÃâÆÇ»ç : µÎ¶õµµ¼­¿ø Æì³½³¯ 1987. 12. 22



1988. 2. 22 - 26 Á¦4ȸ ÄÉÁ÷»ç°æȸ °³ÃÖ

Àå ¼Ò : ÀüºÏ ³»Àå»ê °ü±¤ È£ÅÚ

°­ »ç : Á¦ÀÓ½ºº¸À̽º ¸ñ»ç,ÇÑ°æÁ÷ ¸ñ»ç,¹ÚÀ±¼± ¸ñ»ç,¹ÚÁ¾·Ä ¸ñ»ç

ÁÖ Á¦ : º¹À½°ú »çȸ

Ç¥ ¾î : ±×¸®½ºµµ ¾È¿¡¼­ ¸ðµÎ Çϳª

ÃâÆÇ : Á¦¸ñ : "º¹À½°ú »çȸ" (Á¦4ȸ ¼­¿ï ÄÉÁ÷ÀÇ ¸Þ½ÃÁö)

µÎ¶õ³ë¼­¿ø °­Çؼ³±³ ½Ã¸®Áî 14

¿«ÀºÀÌ : Çѱ¹º¹À½ÁÖÀÇÇùÀÇȸ

ÃâÆÇ»ç : µÎ¶õµµ¼­¿ø Æì³½³¯ 1989. 3. 31



1989. 2. 13 - 16 Á¦5ȸ ÄÉÁ÷»ç°æȸ °³ÃÖ

Àå ¼Ò : ¼Ò¸Á±³È¸

°­ »ç : Çʸ³ ÇÙÅ· (Philip Hacking)¸ñ»ç

Å丶½º ¿Õ (Thomas Wang)¸ñ»ç

ÁÖ Á¦ : ¼º°æ°ú Àüµµ

Ç¥ ¾î : ±×¸®½ºµµ¾È¿¡¼­ ¸ðµÎ Çϳª

Ãâ ÆÇ :



1991. 2. 11 - 14 Á¦ 6ȸ ¡°¼­¿ïÄÉÁ÷»ç°æȸ¡±¸¦ ÇÒ·¼·ç¾ß ±³È¸´ç¿¡¼­ °³ÃÖÇÏ´Ù.

ÁÖ°­»ç : ·¹À̸óµå ºê¶ó¿î(Raymond Brown)¹Ú»ç

(¿µ±¹ ½ºÆÞÁÔ½ÅÇб³ ±³Àå, ºòÅ丮¾Æ ħ·Ê±³È¸ ´ãÀÓ¸ñ»ç)

ÁÖ Á¦ : ¼º°æ°ú dzºÎÇÑ »î



<Àú³á»ç°æȸ>

1. ±¸º°µÈ »î 2. ÇعæµÈ »î 3. ÇູÇÑ »î 4. dzºÎÇÑ »î

<¿ÀÀü ¼º°æ°øºÎ>

1. Çϳª´ÔÀÇ ¾Æµé(°è1Àå) 2. Çϳª´ÔÀÇ ¹é¼º(°è2,3Àå)

3. Çϳª´ÔÀÇ º¸ÁÂ(°è 4,5Àå)

ÇùÁ¶ °­»ç: ±è»óº¹ ¸ñ»ç, ¼ÕºÀÈ£ ±³¼ö, ±è¸íÇõ ¸ñ»ç

<¿ÀÈÄƯ°­> : ¼º°æÀÌ °¡¸£Ä¡´Â

1. ¿µÀû °¢¼º°ú ¿µÀû »ýÈ° (±è»óº¹)

2. À±¸®Àû °¢¼º°ú À±¸®Àû »ýÈ° (¼ÕºÀÈ£)

3. ºÀ»çÀû °¢¼º°ú ºÀ»çÀû »ýÈ° (±è¸íÇõ)

ÃâÆÇ : Á¦¸ñ : "»ç¶ûÀÇ ½Çõ" (Çѱ¹º¹À½ÁÖÀÇÇùÀÇȸ ¼Ò½ÄÁö Á¦8È£)

(¿ÀÈÄ Æ¯°­¸¸ ½Ç¸²)

¿«ÀºÀÌ : Çѱ¹º¹À½ÁÖÀÇÇùÀÇȸ

ÃâÆÇ»ç : ¼º±¤¹®È­»ç Æì³½³¯ 1992. 1. 30



1992. 2. 10 - 13 Á¦7ȸ ¼­¿ï ÄÉÁ÷»ç°æȸ °³ÃÖ

Àå ¼Ò : ÃæÇö±³È¸

°­ »ç : Äɳ׽º ÇÁ¶óÀÌ¿À(Canon Kenneth Prior)¸ñ»ç

(¿µ±¹ÄÉÁ÷»ç°æȸ ÁÖ°­»ç,¿µ±¹º¹À½ÁÖÀÇÇùÀÇȸ ȸÀ忪ÀÓ)

Á¤Áø°æ ¸ñ»ç, ¹ÚÁ¾·Ä ¸ñ»ç

ÁÖ Á¦ : ¼º°æ°ú ÁöµµÀÚÀÇ ÀÚÁú



<Àú³á »ç°æȸ> : ±×¸®½ºµµÀÎÀÇ »ýÈ°ÀÇ º»Áú

1. ÁË»çÇÔÀÇ ±â»Ý 2. Á·ÇÑ ÀºÇý¸¦ ¹ÞÀ½ 3. ÂüµÈ Çå½Å

4. ¼º·ÉÀ» ÀÌÇØÇÔ

<¿ÀÀü ¼º°æ°øºÎ> : ¸ñȸ»ç¿ª°ú Àγ» (°íÈÄ4,5Àå)

1. »ç¿ªÀÇ ¹æ¹ý°ú ½ºÅ¸ÀÏ 2. ¾àÇÔÀ» ±Øº¹ÇÔ 3. È­¸ñÀÇ »ç¿ª

<¿ÀÈÄ Æ¯°­> : ÁöµµÀÚÀÇ ÀÚÁú

1. ÁöµµÀÚÀÇ À§Çè (ÇÁ¶óÀÌ¿À)

2. ±³È¸ÀÚµµÀÚÀÇ ÀÚÁú (¹ÚÁ¾·Ä)

3. ¸ñȸÀÚÀÇ ÀÚÁú (Á¤Áø°æ)

Ãâ ÆÇ :



2001. 2. 12 - 15 Á¦8ȸ ¼­¿ï ÄÉÁ÷»ç°æȸ °³ÃÖ

ÁÖ Á¦ : ±×¸®½ºµµÀÇ ÁÖ µÇ½É°ú ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Á¾ µÊ

Àå ¼Ò : °­º¯±³È¸´ç

°­ »ç : ·¹ÀÌ¸Õµå ºê¶ó¿î(Raymond Brown)¸ñ»ç

(½ºÆÞÀü½ÅÇÐ ´ëÇÐÀå ¿ªÀÓ, ºòÅ丮¾Æħ·Ê±³È¸

´ãÀÓ¸ñ»ç ¿ªÀÓ) ±è»óº¹ ¸ñ»ç, ÀÌÁ¾À± ¸ñ»ç, ¼ÕºÀÈ£ ¹Ú»ç

Ãâ ÆÇ :



2000. 7, 15 - 21 ¿µ±¹ ÄÉÁ÷ »ç°æȸ

Ãâ ÆÇ : ±è¸íÇõ, "ÄÉÁ÷, ¾Ï½ºÅÚ´ã ¸Þ½ÃÁö"(¼º±¤¹®È­»ç,2002)





All one in Christ Jesus...

"Have you ever attended such meetings as that of Keswick without experiencing that in the same measure that God the Holy Ghost draws nearer and nearer, your interior atmosphere is modified, and there comes a moment in which you breathe the mountain air?"

-Otto Stockmaiar



Are you perhaps familiar with a handful of the most prominent Christian spiritual leaders and teachers of the early part of this past 20th century? I refer such distinguished names as that of Oswald Chambers, Andrew Murray, F.B. Meyer, Hannah Whitall Smith, Charles Fox, Handley Moule, and Elder Cummings? Well, believe it or not, but these high impact individuals were all strong advocates to, active participants in, and inspirational speakers at, the original Keswick Holiness Convention held in the picturesque Lakeland district of northwestern England. Truly, what a remarkable scenario indeed envisioning such a historically impressive group, and from so many varying denominations, actually united, encouraging and supporting one another towards living holy lives in Christ!



What is the Keswick Convention? So, what exactly then is Keswick and how did it originate? Well, you must first recognize that in the latter 1800's there was an immense amount of interest in the pursuing after a generally deeper Christian spirituality. Robert Pearsall Smith and his wife, Hannah, were two such "pursuers", and Hannah's newly published book on practical holiness entitled The Christian's Secret of a Happy Life, was an immediate international success. In this her bestseller book, she ceases not in announcing her conviction as for the need of a "common sense" religion which would inevitably and invariably lead one unto a life of experiential holiness. She writes:

"It is the only true Christian life which is best described in the words 'The life hid with Christ in God'. It is far beyond ordinary Christian experience. The chief characteristics of the higher Christian life are a complete surrender to the Lord, a perfect trust in him, resulting in victory over sin; and finally, inward rest of soul."



So appealing, welcome, and fresh was this simple message regarding a practical sanctification, that the Smiths were not only invited to speak in several British cities, but in touring other European countries as well. Now the Smiths' core message on holiness was not a new one to the 19th century as Charles Finney and John Wesley's earlier writings regarding "Christian perfection", along with Quaker spirituality's well known focus on "quietism" were already heavy influences in Christian circles at that time. Keswick began out of the inspiration from all of these sources, but the immediate catalyst was the influence of Hannah's newly written book. A prominent British cleric who was so immensely and overwhelmingly affected by the Smith's inspired message soon afterwards invited the American couple to be honored speakers at his newly conceived church-sponsored holiness convention. He was Canon Harford-Battersby, a dedicated and devout pastor in Keswick, England. The year was 1875.



The Convention's lowly beginnings. Robert and Hannah were not only simply invited to the very first Keswick Convention as distinctive honorary guests, by the way, but they were no less asked to lead the thing! The whole convention, in fact, was from its initial conception notably dependant upon the Smiths' celebrity influence, and expectations everywhere were therefore very high. For remember, Robert and Hannah may have verily chosen the crowds of London, Stockholm, or Manchester as to being the recipients of hearing their testimony, but instead they most curiously directed their European tour plans unto the tiny, obscure, remote English village of Keswick. Needless to say, and in spite of this fact, the convention's foundational emphasis on personal sanctity was so resolute and focused, even from it's initial inception, that it would soon prove itself to be an independant success story with relation unto Mr. and Mrs. Smith. The message of holiness itself, and not some invited celebrity presence, would be more than enough to make this small Lakeland gathering a most worthwhile venture indeed. For as things would eventually turn out, Robert and his wife Hannah would never even make it to show at all, citing "ministerial difficulties" as the specificly vague excuse for their cancellation and absense. The internationally famous couple ended up returning back home to the United States instead. Understandably, this must have been an enormous letdown unto their poor Anglican host! Or so it would seem. Shaky and ill equipped, Harford-Battersby was forced to muster the reigns as the chairman of this much anticipated holiness meeting himself, accompanied by only a few local, predominantly Anglican, ministers. "All One in Christ Jesus" under the cover and framework of personal sanctity, was the proclaimed motto that first year and has remained so ever since, even unto the present. And it was this first Keswick holiness conference, convened back in 1875, which turned out to be an amazing success story, exceeding all possible expectations... carried only by the weight of the strength of its own message on sanctity. An annual reconvening seemed an inevitability to most everyone involved with the affair. The Keswick Convention had been born! Such were the humble beginnings of the holiness movement which was to sweep its influence across not only the English counties, but which would later spread to the whole civilized world, spanning the entirity of the following century.



A Victorian Age Success Story. In the years to follow, Keswick's success would attract many of the top international Christian leaders to this remote English village, and the convention would in time make a name for itself as the predominant global center for not only holiness teaching, but for Christianity itself. Because you see, 19th century Christian faith as a whole was "infected" with holiness principles and most every noted leader at this time was known to have experienced a "crisis of sanctification". It was literally everywhere in the church and Keswick had now become its epicenter. Phrases like "the higher life" and "the second blessing" were commonplace in the 19th century Christian church and across all the many varied denominations. Keswick was instrumental in helping further propogate this cause - the pressing need for sanctity in the life of the believer.



The Keswick Convention was without a doubt an influential international epicenter of holiness teaching throughout the latter quarter of the 19th century. But one may also ask this question: Was Keswick inclusive or exclusive? For it might be imagined that in retrospect to the convention's apparently unique and inclusive theme of experiential sanctity, an inclusive and unique audience would be the inevitable result. Because such often is the tendency, of course. But such in fact was NOT the case at all, in this instance. From the very beginning, even in its inaugural year, the Keswick convention resolutely purposed itself towards embracing an intentional non-denominational foundation, welcoming Christians of all varying theological viewpoints, backgrounds and traditions (where both Calvinist and Arminian felt at home). Additionally, social, economical, and cultural backgrounds were not scrutinized by this convention, for the primary vision of Keswick was simply towards an objective, but impassioned, leading of individuals into the life of personal holiness. Even the leaders, guest, and key note speakers at the convention were themselves a wonderfully diverse mix of Christians representing most every denominational and social background. One contemporary commentor remarks:

"This tendency created an entire generation of 'undenominationalists' who knew no ecclesiastical boundaries. This was the immediate strength of the Keswick movement."



The Keswick Convention was surely an inspiring vision to behold in its early years as it was an historically unique center for both specific theological emphasis along with, and incorporating, a more general and yet no less successful appeal for church unity...the one no less impacting the other.



Keswick's Gradual Demise. However, times have changed. Society has changed. The church has changed. And unfortunately, and rather sadly, Keswick has changed as well. Muted over the many years since its inception (a slow and gradual decay), and often since found compromising unto the whims and growing indescretions of a noticably more secularly-inclined 20th century society, the Keswick convention has since drifted from it's original foundation. With reference unto 20th century Christianity specifically, it is often noted that the influx of the Pentecostal movement, coupled with the diverting changes in general perceptions concerning modern day evangelism, have also helped swerve the convention away from it's formerly advanced (although made by the mystery of faith, simple) and focused theology unto more conventional and commonly regarded Christian approaches to teaching and preaching. Charles Price writes,

"(these factors) steered the convention into what was regarded by some as safer waters, where it bacame less definitive theologically in the area of its main historical thrust - the ministry of the Holy Spirit in the sanctification of believers. The perception now arose that Keswick represented a bland, non-controversial, and safe position. This view has caused some to view the Convention as lacking in the relevance it once had, and becoming of minor significance to the overall forward movement of the church of Jesus Christ in Great Britain."



It is needless to say that the convention is not the spiritual nor ecclestiastical heavyweight it once was, and it can be readily argued that it is the lost theme of experiential holiness which has deemed it, as this commentor so bluntly describes it as being, "of now minor significance to the overall forward movement of the Church of Christ in Great Britain". As a curious sort of bynote, I would also like to mention the fact that it is often generally regarded by many commentators that the focus and emphasis on personal sanctity finally sputtered to it's end in the Keswick realm sometime during the late 1970's. But even regardless of Keswick's gradual demise, please do give the convention the credit it most sincerely deserves in recognizing that it does still exist - even after 125 years! The longevity of the convention, in and of itself, should provide a very worthwhile and important lesson unto the contemporary church of today. Should it not? For it just goes to show, if nothing else, that you can't beat a good foundation. And what was that foundation, you might inquire? Well, let's see... did Keswick focus solely on Jesus? Yes! check. Did it affect an unprecedented type of church unity even amidst otherwise strong denominational conflicts? Yes! check. Did it lead to success in the sphere of evangelism? Most certainly. check. Did it offer the intangibles, such as vision, inspiration, promise and hope? By all means. check. All these wonderful things combined and blended together may be embodied within the fruits of one core Christian promise -for lack of any better or more appropriate term, let us herein refer to it quite simply as... holiness.



Keswick Lesson #1: Christians should never underestimate the all-encompassing benefits of not only an individual, but a corporate, pressing on to spiritual maturity.



Keswick Lesson #2: Um... refer to Lesson #1. And refer again. And again. And...



Conclusions. My primary point in constructing this 'Keswick page' that you have just now read and in bringing your specific attention to this century old meeting in rural England is simply this: We present day Christians, as part of the 21st century church so desperately need some sort of modern-day "Keswick Convention" in order to help inspire us, unite us, and to no less than reorient us. Contemporary Christians generally don't even know what perfection is, nevermind are they trying to make determined efforts towards living it out. Some kind of catalyst, perhaps not unlike Hannah's book, must be initiated in order to help get things back on track.





[ÀμâÇϱâ] 2005-05-29 17:40:27


   


°ü¸®Àڷα×ÀÎ~~ Àüü 776°³ - ÇöÀç 16/52 ÂÊ
¹øÈ£
Á¦¸ñ
À̸§
ÆÄÀÏ
³¯Â¥
Á¶È¸
551 ¿ùµåÄÅ 2010-07-22 584
550 °æ¸¶Á¤º¸ 2010-07-21 474
549 °æ¸¶Ãʺ¸ 2010-07-21 517
548 °æ¸¶¿Õ 2010-07-21 606
547 ±è¸íÇõ ¸ñ»ç 2005-09-16 1161
546 ÀüÁÖû³â 2005-09-02 1086
545 ±è¸íÇõ ¸ñ»ç 2005-09-04 1085
544 ÀüÁÖû³â 2005-09-04 981
543 ÀÌöÈñ 0000-00-00 1018
542 ±è¸íÇõ ¸ñ»ç 2005-09-02 1008
541 ÃʽÅÀÚ 2005-06-02 1142
540 ±è¸íÇõ ¸ñ»ç 2005-06-04 1203
539 À强±Ù 2005-05-26 1055
±è¸íÇõ ¸ñ»ç 2005-05-29 2662
537 À强±Ù 2005-05-31 1173
[13] [14] [15] 16 [17] [18] [19]